execution of the score opened a few interesting aspects >>>
first of all, the variations and motives i created still had a logic of gestures, i.e. the logic of speech >>>
- the movements, like gestures, like, in fact, speech, were directed to the audience frontally >>> they were striving to be seen and read >>> simultaneously i felt the necessity to have an eye contact with the audience, like during the speech, to be aware of the attention of my spectators >>>
- the movement, like gestures, like speech, didn’t strive to travel in space, so i deliberately condensed them in one spot >>> the sequences don’t move from it >>>
- the sequences – exactly like speech – asked for fluidity, and i intended to reach a certain flow in the motion that would rhyme with the flow of speech >>>
SEQUENCE 1
SEQUENCE 2
as you might see, the sequences contain additional information comparing with gestures >>> CAN’T in its variations gets new qualities >>> VIOLIN renders both legato and staccato >>> OVER from a simple preposition ascends to a movement image >>>
the imagery develops, the initial meanings multiply, the content behind words is explicated through movement >>> however, the sequences felt still very concrete, theatrical, and figurative >>> for that reason, i decided to transform them further and render them more abstract >>>